Climate change is real.
Environmental degradation is real.
Global warming as stated by the U.N. is a fraud, used as a preconditional arguement for the imposition of global governance through global taxation.

There is a very important distinction to be made here: mankinds impact on the biomes as a whole vs. mankinds impact on climate change. Our impact on climate change is highly suspect; however we can all agree about our impact on environmental degradation.

But let us go one step further and perform a discrete analysis of trends regarding environmental degradation. Where are the worst examples to be found? Can an analysis of such examples yield validation to Malthusian arguments?

It seems to me that “kill all humans” argumentation is being smuggled into a larger dynamism where it is industry and the profit motive per se which is the real culprit. Power and wealth who hold within their clutches the capacity to produce or to not produce a civilization wherein such environmental impact is a reality have tried to persuade us that the consumer and their habits are the culprit.

But let me dispel this myth if I may: greed, competition and the auspices of a “free market”, itself a theoretical impossibility, stand behind every instance of arguable degradation. The brutal interplay of the market system, of competition and not cooperation between producers, the warlike struggle between “nationalistic” markets – these elements of our civilization are the Real culprits who stand behind every series of impact. I might at this point extol the benefits of a global market in which competition is aggregated and thus diminished, where the producers of the world can with efficient organization meet the needs of the worlds consumers in a healthy fashion – if it weren’t for the obvious charge that such a system at this stage in our civilization would merely be corrupted and used as a vehicle for the elite to dominate and oppress all culture and that the benefits of organization and efficiency would never come to exist if the reigns of power are left in the hands of the greedy and the elitist.

The real problem then is that very culture of elitism which has produced the global corporatism tendency. Global collectivist economics is an alternative, out beyond socialism there exits the very real possibility for a system of emergent business; however, the danger will always exist that the regulative bodies of such a system would become corrupt. Therefore it seems inevitable that certain categories of answer to this dilemma must be employed, each with their own dangers.

Let me propose a few examples.

Firstly, that the systems of regulation which must necessarily exist are not comprised of technocrats but rather of AI’s, organic computing AI’s which self evolved to address the concerns. The danger here is that while one has relieved the concern of “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” with regard to who would program the AI’s, the very algorithms themselves have become the new watchers. It seems this methodology again is little better than hoping for a benevolent dictatorship!

Secondly, that we do not dispense with a technocratic regulative body for such a global production system, a centrally planned global economy which utilizes emergent principles that focus on localized control of relevant systems may be possible to govern by a sort of virtual republic – that is to say that a congress of the world. While this is a typically aristocratic approach in a certain sense, it should be obvious that we cannot avoid the necessity of utilizing those humans with expertise in a given field in order to address the associated concerns of regulation within our system. Therefore it is incumbent upon us to take Plato scholarship more seriously; an unmanaged study of the classics in general furnishes us with some of the tools we need to begin to understand what must occur if we are to produce the sorts of watchers we can entrust the governance of regulation to. But this is in a sense as dangerous as the system we have now! We run the risk of republic degenerating into mere democracy!

Virtual representation at any rate seems possible given the existence of internet technology as such: transparent, non-linear policy and the vetting thereof by emergent systems is a reality we cannot afford to neglect. If we are to approach the resolution to this question via the avenue of localized and localizing controls we can look forward to a system that successfully addresses the needs of the individual – the individual who must become sovereign.

Do I then argue with Gasset? No, I do not argue with his analysis, I argue that such an analysis is possible! The illusion of the categories employed by all historical thought in this field break down almost immediately when one increases the complexity of the data modeling structures so that they begin to approach reality!

We only now have the technology to model the individual and civilization with a degree of fidelity that would make such analysis concrete. And we have not used it thusly, if we have used it at all it is to catalogue mankind in brutal ways, you ARE your FICO score and etc., we have transposed the complexity of the individual onto synthetic systems of data and the result has been an epidemic of hopelessness – this is logical, mankind is not a synthetic being but is an incomprehensibly complex thing! It is our arrogance perhaps that we think we know, but it is unwise and it is disingenuous: one must laugh almost that the egotistical dissimulation of the complexity of one’s fellow man is so prevalent in those who think so highly of themselves, what then is not your own nature complex my good sir?

It is obvious to us that the universe (or our pocket of it, a miraculous and precarious lea redoubt in a sea of chaos) organizes according to higher and higher states of energy, certainly when it comes to the wonder that is Organic Life this is the case. How is it then that we have been lulled to sleep? How could we have been taught to sell our heroes for ghosts, hot air for a cold dream?

To ask the question Curtis puts so eloquently – What happened to our dreams of freedom?

The Great Global Warming Swindle

Global Warming or Global Governance

The Trap pt.1

The Trap pt.2

The Trap pt.3

http://ayrabella.stumbleupon.com/

can i deny it? that i read and burnt the book of the law?

but who is pulling who – hoor paar kraat – Temporeality

but who today knows what reading is? life as magic: who today has the courage for the most difficult things and who can tie up even the tongues of the most profane?

very well, i am a thief

i broke into the temple and shattered the seals with the crude harmonies of dead gods – i stood against both my own teachers and those whom they sought to master – i rejected everything and got OUT

ra hoor khuit looks away and is bashful

ahead of my time at the end of days
i am the rhyme of discordant ways

selah

Having spoken at length into the open air, in great detail about many things – having resolved the entire modern crisis into the following formula: get mad and make others mad. It was enough to praise the quantum dualistic nature of existence and to throw into the synthetic soup of modernity the following lines.

the ability to let that which does not matter- truly slide.

to put aside the logistical considerations imposed by a culture into which one has been born and to focus, like some kind of high powered laser, on matters of the most discrete substance. To thus burn away, even within one’s own mind, the inequities and inhumanity of an entire age: to become ever clearer whilst all about one becomes cloudy – to arrange and to sort the infinite space within whilst all about us chaos reigns

bravery, the kind of bravery that only those who die fighting for a noble cause can know well, this is the greatest prize among all the treasures of this life.

simplify simplify simplify

drawing ever smaller circles around ones hierarchy of needs until at last a fortress against the waste of our age stands, impervious, a lea redoubt amid the wastelands of our time.

As a sort of anti-metaphysician I naturally gravitate towards the atheistic; however, it is clear to me the notion of deity is irrefutable and moreover, as a quantum dualist I must admit that the universe is integral in nature and therefore the idea of an integrated network of fields of energy by its own nature connotes something like deity. Although I essentially do not like organized religion in most cases because it historically proves to be hostile to humanity and to the furtherance of what I would consider a justifiable equity in terms of the dispensation of society, I am all for freedom of religion and the mandate that matters regarding church and state be cordoned off from one another. This cordoning is perhaps more and more impossible as the ethical degeneracy of a people increases and as the information within a civilization increases (as it does within ours at an exponential rate! To the extent that in fact we now are literally deluged by synthetic information and much of it is junk information). And yet I feel it is very certain that religions are still fundamentally necessary to our civilization as a whole, the main reason I would say is that they provide a hedge against outright inhumanity – that is not to say that atheists are inherently inhuman, morality itself to me is a perspective, but I must point out that the tendencies of synthetic systems produce synthetic values and without a strong ethical code invite gross inhumanities. Which is worse: an auto-da-fe or factory farming human beings in an economic system of hopeless sterility?

When we perceive the vastness of our universe it seems only natural that some of us would suggest that organic life, indeed, intelligent life probably must exists somewhere else amidst the sea of stars. But a sobering realization occurs to me, rather than formulating drake-like equations, I suggest that by the very same principles for the creation of any such equation we might equally suggest that we are alone. And just imagine that for a moment, it seems much easier for people to imagine that we are not as I find generally two types of humans: one who thinks that there is a god and that we might be alone or that we might not and one that thinks there is exobiology and sentient at that. Indeed there may be sentience out there that takes up the form of a crystalline latticework or pure energy, any number of sci-fi reductions might be postulated; however, what I do not see are people eager to grasp the assumption that we are completely alone. We have sufficient evidence to suggest that we are alone for the time being and until proven otherwise does it not make sense to act as though this were the case? Better yet (and perhaps more to the point) does it not make sense to suspect that if there is intelligent life in the universe, given that we are the only intelligent life we know of, that we would be discreet fearing enslavement by extra terrestrial life? Perhaps we are better off focusing on stabilizing our civilization and pursuing the art of war, not so as to war with one another, but so as to prepare for a potential conflict originating from someplace out in that vast sea.

Really – this is my only point and I have been rambling only to arrive at long last in a way that seems digressive here: god, exobiology, neither of these things should concern us.

What? Should we throw away our two most favorite intellectual toys and grow up?

Yes.

It is time to grow up humanity, noble men and women die of starvation in the mud while arrogant and inhuman despots live in luxury. The earth is a linear system – we have allowed our civilization to be constructed ad hoc at the whim of the most powerful, a Machiavellian ordering has persisted since we first approached a specialized organization of our societies. And now, as the last vestiges of primitive cultures are chased out of their homes by bulldozers, it is dawning on us that the limits of natural abundance are all too real (so much realer than any gods or aliens).

The reaction to this by those with wealth and power is Malthusian at best – how did you think we could stop the preproduction of such a culturalism? How can we avert the centralization of a civilization based on specialization if not via a nodal network approach like organic computing models, how can we produce an emergent civilization while we still labor under archaic constructs like nations, corporations, and worst of all the U.N. ? This is the era of petty kingdoms; the corporation is king, greater than any nation state. Nations themselves only exist as expedients as we enter into a dark age of global corporatism where humanity is little more than fuel to a machine over which ultimately no one has control. How did you think we could stop this trend and become what we are if we did not shake off the cumbersome impositions of such atavistic systems?

You cannot get your hands dirty with such real work until you have put down your toys for awhile. And yes the newest toy is progress, the notion of progress, and this is what I meant by the potential inhumanity of synthetic systems – that we would create a society wherein the human being is nothing more than one more synthetic value!

Think! We have reduced mankind, the sole repository of universal truth, to a mere value within a synthetic system – and the commoditization of the individual advances unchecked! What can the result of such actions be if it is not the destruction of everything good in this world?

We have enough technology: we had enough technology 5 decades ago to produce a civilization we could all be proud of, and here we are chasing the higgs boson while human beings are factory farmed in Indonesia in order to make Gap clothing. Are you not disgusted with yourselves oh my fellow creatures? I am disgusted, those who came before us ( I was born in 1977) from the ancient civilizations, to the pre-Socratic philosophers through to the modern era have created art and opened our minds to ideas of wondrous possibilities – even now science and technology offer us the surest means to overcoming the oppressive linearity of the world in which we find ourselves. And yet, is science not the bitch of markets? Is technology not a slave to the whims of a handful of dominant men? Are not our universities today little more than the tombs and sepulchers of our greatest thinkers?

We ignore our best minds: that is what I see, a society where synthetic values dominate and where the projections of an existing status quo which is itself inimical to life persist and are enshrined by our apathy. I see a world’s population brainwashed, bought and sold before they are even born into a system of control so complete and vexing that escape or dissent are impossible – at best the slaves rattle their shackles and call this fidgeting freedom.

And what are the prima facie hedges against change? Metaphysics and Super-science stand as the gatekeepers of this mad game: we would chase the edge of the universe and ignore the homeless and the depravity of our culture!

Now you might think I am anti-science, but the reverse is true: I am a quantum dualistic physicist. I am working on a theory for “fuel injection” in IEC fusion via Bose-Einstein vortices produced by pulsed high voltage which could solve the reaction rate problem that keeps the technology from being viable. But this is a perfect example of the sorts of things we should emphasize.

Now I don’t mean to discourage particle physics work like LHC, it is instrumental, nor do I mean to do away with cosmology and astrophysics – quite the contrary, I merely seek proportionality in our civilization. I know only all too well how the insights and achievements of thousands of years of psychology and science have been used to enslave humanity.

Here’s a good example: Freud’s psychoanalysis was ripped off and used to create P.R., or another would be how Bohr and Einstein and many others were used to create nuclear weapons. These are crude examples but they will serve as sufficient evidence of the sort of dynamism I mean. For precisely this reason I think Heraclitus wrote his major work in a deliberately difficult to understand fashion, not so as to create an ecclesiastical dogma that only priests or some ruling class could interpret, but to sequester from all greedy and corrupt hands his insights into the nature of existence.

Would that today our best scientific minds were motivated less by greed and aspirations of fame or success, and more by a copious understanding of the extent to which all their predecessors were but cows to a wicked game whose goal is the total enslavement of mankind. But where do the research grants come from!

HAHA! And now you see why we must put away our toys friends – no matter what our profession we must all become POLITICAL. We must all study the humanities and aspire to be statesmen; we must all become good citizens and shoot at princes!

Men of the world wherefore plow

Those fields now that ye Are laid low?

Re-educate thyselves – affix anew

All of value, hitherto, ye knew.

But does anyone read Shelley now? I mean outside the university system as part of some course on literature or poetry? We have need of new arts that condense and transmit the past, because we are overwhelmed by the surfeit of synthetic information. Just to live now one must have ready access to a wide array of synthetic information, so much more than our ancestors. And this is another hedge against any sort of real change in our civilization.

Namely: the way society has been constructed to so deplete the nervous energy of the individual that they are rendered helpless with regard to dissent or reformation. We have been tricked into enslaving ourselves and have become our own prison guards in a concrete jungle we loathe. And yet many do not even see the slavery, the masses sleepwalk through 70-100 years of toil and die clutching a golden pocket watch.

More than anyone I wish perhaps there were a god or aliens, some dues ex machine to draw this drama to a close – but I am ever skeptical and ever vigilant against such things. For I realize these are the traps into which the mind is lured in order to seize hold of it.

My message is simple then: man is a chess player, in it for the game, Liberty, Freedom, Justice – these are not synthetic items which can be seized but forms which must be continually sought. This entire essay then is a plea to my fellow humans to rally and to pursue as a species that which is our greatest hope: our True Potential.

Here is the fundamental error: scarcity.

Scarcity as logical basis for an economy produces inhumanity by necessity and thereby ensures the preconditions for its own reproduction: a scarcity based economy will never achieve abundance – but that is precisely what we must achieve my friends.

We posses the capacity to construct a civilization which can feed, house and clothe everyone and have had this capacity for 5-6 decades, why then have we failed to produce a civilization we can be proud of? I think you all know why, the avarice of a few men and the sustentation of externalized markets or systems.

We could even create an infrastructure that doesn’t require petroleum; our biggest problem is we have constructed our entire civilization inefficiently and on the basis of cheap abundant oil.

Finite resources must be a governing principle of the new civilization, America 2.0, but it goes beyond logistics…

logistics is key in terms of the organization of a society; however, ask yourself how we got where we are today – it is the ethical degeneration of our society engendered by an educational system run as a business.

The free market as an over riding mercantilism has destroyed us and it has destroyed the world, one might almost believe the psychopathic globalists when they say man is a virus.

But it was they, in their greed and lust to dominate who proceeded inefficiently.

the construction then of an efficient civilization, a logistically and intellectually efficient civilization – one of its first principles must be communality, we already live under a form of socialism and yet does one even know his neighbors name?

We have allowed ourselves to be herded into a survival trip when the vast potential of the species lay all before us – fear and the projection of external enemies has sustained this condition.

We do need a united species in order to sustain any advantage we achieve in the coming years; we must beat the globalists to the punch. Until we unite as a species we cannot hope to ever secure any progress we might make with regard to efficiency because there will always exist the threat of the external: the external market, the external military the external way of life. Toward that end a unified humanity, but not a globalists spider web of mercantilism! Toward that end America 2.0 and a declaration of Independence for the entire species: we must rally now and shake off all would be tyrants once and for all, we must lay the groundwork to prevent this from ever happening again and as you all know this will require enshrining vigilance against such tyranny in the hearts of all succeeding generations.

I want what we all want, freedom from tyranny – the tyranny of starvation, the tyranny of the elements and of wild beasts and most of all the tyranny of my fellow man. They have forced our hand; it is time to get serious about this shit.

Crops didn’t stop growing, it’s not as if all the animals died, the concept of scarcity is daunting but it isn’t an insurmountable problem – in fact it is the key to our future. The great challenge of our era is how to reshape society in an efficient and beautiful way – we must MacGyver a utopia.

Arcologies, tiered hydroponic farming, alternative energy research, open source education as a lifelong goal, a digital library of Alexandria free to all and to that end a diminution of intellectual property law, while at the same time creating a pricing schedule that allows art to flourish.

But before we can do any of it, we must rescue America and sustain the existing configuration to a certain extent: we need to get rid of free trade, impose tariffs, rebuild our infrastructure, open credit to those willing to jump start our production economy – credit facilities not for criminal and ethically bankrupt monetary systems but for people wanting to produce goods that are of intrinsic value (no your i-pod isn’t intrinsically valuable). We must look to the bottom line and make sure everyone has the essentials, food, clothing and shelter.

We must innovate, we must use our vast potential for science as a means to create systems that can make food so cheap only the rich will starve and then only out of some desire to be thin. All luxury goods should have sliding scaled pricing structures, the price then of a yacht would be based on net worth, and this of course assumes that for the first time in history we create a transparent.

A transparent accounting system that will not allow the super rich to shelter their income from taxation, that will not allow human beings to be factory farmed in the third world like they were nothing more than animals.

Congress must assert its authority to create money, this cannot happen with 435 crooks in those seats, we need massive political action immediately to overthrow the corrupt officials we have in office. We need a massive cultural movement toward third parties, we must also secure the executive in this manner or we cannot hope to change things.

everyone who is out there right now still laboring under the delusions of a two party left/right paradigm must be woken up, we cannot afford to let circumstance be their professor and ours for the consequences will be disastrous. If we have to wait for people to wake up to the fact that Obama is a globalist for instance, then it will be too late because they will just vote republican or some shit and thus merely extend the duality and the cycle. Neither party has delivered on my expectations; America is a wasteland of promise overwhelmed by an epidemic of hopelessness.

The gross dichotomy between rich and poor, this gulf between have and have-not grows at an alarming rate and no one seems to have the humanity to fix it. People who could’ve helped fix this situation die at 13 in poverty and isolation while the globalists our faith in this system underwrite push Malthusian agendas on the global market structures.

Somehow I feel like we must create a new Constitution for the peopl of earth andto set about conquering the various nations through trade or through superior culture – only once we have smashed all foreign markets and brought to heel all militaries can we produce a soceity that is efficient.

A digital Library of Alexandria; My NWO; freeing the species for its vast potential: America 2.0 – etc. Like sleepers who are about to awaken we have begun a leg in our journey fraught with peril, peril for the species, for good or bad we have begun the work of gathering up lost branches. We face extinction from nature, from the carelessness and greed of our fellow animals, from our own stupidity – this is the codifying phenomenology of our existence, we moderns.

Embrace what is terrible and let go of everything, together we shall make a way: for I have never found the woman I loved lest it be you, Oh Eternity. I am father, son, brother, to all life, human or otherwise.

http://www.quantummechanist.com/JoshuaRoberts/2008/11/20/i-will-have-the-technology/

notes

1
the cold war as the incubational phase of a globalizing military industrial complex, what nations sought to confine has broken out, virus-like the animal man has found a new freedom for brutality.

the human animal is a fickle creature, we are subject to constant flux

2
i think it is ultimately more a question of the gene encoding adaptations as a highly selective process internalized by the discrete systema. what we must strive to understand is precisely how structural adaptations at the chemical and cellular level result in advantageous organizations of cells and exchanges.

and how these are stored, how the variations are communicated – but we already know alot about this and so the conclusion comes to us – the sheer number of these processes and thier constant occurence across a huge, rich (replete) biome suggets that not only are adaptations being stored and reworked constantly (generational evolution of certain species within our own lifetimes.) but if we study statstical data about a particular species over longer periods of time we see a curve.

this is why genetic businesses are to be outlawed. there is no sufficient framework Possible in which to test the implications of even Minute synthetic variations. that is to say, any attempt to tinker with the biology of a species below a certain scope is essentialy playing god – that in this regard no one can determine the end results leads us to a secondary and perhaps more important conclusions. a republic which cannot make laws against such things cannot stand and exists to the very real and ultimate peril of all life on earth.

that all synthetic methdologies and all technology essentialy alter the biome and soup of the universe and are therefore also playing god, so it is merely a question of Scope or Range in which one plays god. yes, the subtlety to discern where one should not play god is a refined taste to which we should all aspire.

to suggest that there aren’t a staggering number of such processes running right now in all existing biological organisms is ludicrous and yet to suggest that this phenomenology does not somehow devolve on an Evolutionary process does not.

i find that peculiar and yet somehow perfectly human and touching. we do not have the eyes for the work of our own hands.

Source it, extrapolate from it to your own personal experience regarding organized metaphysics, consider the extent to which religion as so practiced fundamentally constitutes one of the pillars of the continuum of domination which rules the waking world.

no seriously, im not fucking with you, go and study the sources. stop and ask yourself some hard questions, no seriously, stop, stop driving, eating and talking on your cell phone. for days if you have to until this shit sinks in, because guess what? where I want to get, I can’t get there without you and I can’t get there with you the way you are…

I need you people, and really, you owe it to the brave men and women who have died for thousands of years to smuggle into your consciousness the very real possibilities for our species. And the Danger, the utter chaos of our universe and how fragile our fucking existence really is you god damned retards – can’t you see how precarious the continued existence of organic life is in the universe? Time is short, we have allot of work to do.

We face in this time the construction of a crystal palace over whose door is hung the motto “Arbeit Macht Frei” but it is not toward a common goal that we toil in vain my friends, no – it is to feed gluttons. —-

As we face the dawn of this complete global fascist technocracy we are for the first time aware, and like a new being awakened we see with new eyes new truths. —- these truths are our heritage, for america is an idea. —- we have the power to create a new world order, and because wicked men wish to claim the prize we must offer up our own model for a free humanity. —- we must build a new digital library of Alexandria, we must free the potential of the species, precisely now in this dark hour in the era of petty kingdoms.

Beauty is realizing there is no room in the world for someone with their eyes open.

bonus points for hitting a U.N. limo

i think she and I couldve had some laughs – she certainly had the integrity to roll with a madman like me. its rather telling that most people who see this focus on linear aspects of it and not on the motivation of the human in the photo, i think its inspiring to see this kind of bravery.

what? can suicide be brave? but such insights are lost on modernists – as tertullian once said “suicide is the last refuge of an honest man” but perhaps this smells too christian even for someone like me, after all I am zarathustra the godless and yet who better to do his work than I?

and so i shall say a prayer to the great magnet, in a thought i shall give this brave woman everything her heart desired, for i love you Oh eternity!

neither the average citizen of the world nor the very people who hold power care one bit, and all the injuries and casualties in such massive protests will be on the side of the enlightened, so eager is the human animal to sacrifice itself. Like grapes which have grown ripe they long for the vintners knife.

and the few who see the violence of the state and react in kind shall merely be used as evidence in the campaign to ratchet up the existing police-state, this has global ramifications.

for thousands of years we have been winning this great war for the sanctity of ideals and occasionally people seek to spruce up the altar of our ideologies with their own blood, in a vain attempt to remind the uninitiated of what is at stake. but dont be in such a rush to throw yourselves away, and expose yourselves to all-seeing-eye in so deliberate a fashion.

never take a knife to a gunfight, dont think you can solve a 21st century problem with 20th century methodologies…

the few who have escaped the all-consuming zeitgeist and awakened to some semblance of reality waste their time marching like ants along streets to which they no longer have a name or right, to be abused by the minions of the plutocratic technocracy.

cataloged into databases, awaiting the INEVITABLE.