Joshua Roberts

notes

1
the cold war as the incubational phase of a globalizing military industrial complex, what nations sought to confine has broken out, virus-like the animal man has found a new freedom for brutality.

the human animal is a fickle creature, we are subject to constant flux

2
i think it is ultimately more a question of the gene encoding adaptations as a highly selective process internalized by the discrete systema. what we must strive to understand is precisely how structural adaptations at the chemical and cellular level result in advantageous organizations of cells and exchanges.

and how these are stored, how the variations are communicated – but we already know alot about this and so the conclusion comes to us – the sheer number of these processes and thier constant occurence across a huge, rich (replete) biome suggets that not only are adaptations being stored and reworked constantly (generational evolution of certain species within our own lifetimes.) but if we study statstical data about a particular species over longer periods of time we see a curve.

this is why genetic businesses are to be outlawed. there is no sufficient framework Possible in which to test the implications of even Minute synthetic variations. that is to say, any attempt to tinker with the biology of a species below a certain scope is essentialy playing god – that in this regard no one can determine the end results leads us to a secondary and perhaps more important conclusions. a republic which cannot make laws against such things cannot stand and exists to the very real and ultimate peril of all life on earth.

that all synthetic methdologies and all technology essentialy alter the biome and soup of the universe and are therefore also playing god, so it is merely a question of Scope or Range in which one plays god. yes, the subtlety to discern where one should not play god is a refined taste to which we should all aspire.

to suggest that there aren’t a staggering number of such processes running right now in all existing biological organisms is ludicrous and yet to suggest that this phenomenology does not somehow devolve on an Evolutionary process does not.

i find that peculiar and yet somehow perfectly human and touching. we do not have the eyes for the work of our own hands.