There is a fix for this, we must immediately reconstitute our production economy.

This has several daunting but necessary preconditions

1) oust a majority of the senate and house, replacing them with good americans who are not corrupt fucking sell outs who collude with business and industry in order to reap personal benefits. People who are not Malthusian NWO shills.

1a) Eliminate globalization by requiring of all companies with any percentage of their business outsourced to a foreign country taxes equal to the difference in trade. That is to say that Walmart for instance would have to ultimately charge the customer More for a given Imported product than a domestically produced one, thus eliminating the incentive to import goods or to force its producers to manufacture overseas.
2) Nationalize the Federal Reserve System and hand over its architecture Immediately from the Federal Government to the States and local legislatures themselves.

3) Create and issue local currencies, create a national currency backed by silver.

4) Pull our troops out of every foreign country and close our military bases around the world. Rededicate the national guard to assisting in local non law enforcement roles of infrastructural refurbishment.

5) Eliminate the IRS and abolish the income tax. (I have written a recent post which delineates my proposal in some detail)

6) Unless the measure in my tax system are implemented immediately begin a process of incrementally tariffing imports. Eliminate subsidization on all GMO agribusiness. Nullify all standing free trade agreements such as NAFTA, GATT, etc.

7) Webster Tarpley in this WCR broadcast
youtube.com/view_play_list [youtube.com]
has listed several key steps which should be included in an overall plan of actions, including, but not limited to, halting all foreclosures on Productive businesses.

Leave the U.N. outrightly and cut all monies to them, Cut foreign aid to countries like Israel or anyone else who doesn’t need it.

9) Reconstitute the FDA completely as must be done with congress.

10) Immediately begin with the new congress to audit and peruse all standing governmental agencies, leaving not a stone unturned.

10a) Begin a gradual but inevitable process of eliminating a majority of the federal government, turning the power over to the states themselves and replacing the federal government with a networking systems infrastructure capable of Facilitating the states in matters where an individual state finds itself unable to resolve an issues on its own and requires the cooperation and resources of other states to address the problem. The goal should be to effectively return operational control of the nation over to the states themselves leaving only a system capable of bringing the combined resources of the states to bear AS DIRECTED BY THE STATES THEMSELVES on issues which daunt any one state of pose a threat to national sovereignty.  To this end the military infrastructure must be reconstituted and effectively treaties created in the form of state legislation which mandates that the states cooperate together in the event of a national threat such as invasion.

11) Eliminate all funding for the so-called War on Drugs and essentially legalize all drugs while funding a comprehensive health care initiative aimed at educating children of a certain age about the perils of drug abuse and facilitating those citizens who are addicted such that they do not pose a risk to the public weal.

12) Halt all immigration to the United States for a brief time period. Pour what assets we can into reconstituting a truly universal system of education whose goal is to produce from the population of the country Engineers, Software Programmers, and other highly skilled workers.

13) Begin a national push towards a truly 21st century economy, using robotics and other emergent technologies.

14) Immediately repeal all authorization for Genetic Patents, Outlaw the practice of patenting genetic information, dissolve existing companies by force if necessary.

15) Perhaps most importantly turn the bandwidth over to the people. Take the power of the fourth estate out of the hands of big corporations and put it into the hands of the american people (note that this issue would also be addressed during a review of the FCC and should be coupled with activities suggested in point #10).

Consider the following:

16) Eliminate the laws that allow corporations to be formed. Mandate the dissolution of existing corporations into their constituent businesses.

17) Outlaw the trading or ownership of stock save but by those with a vested interest in the company itself and require of the owners of any business that they must divest into the hands of the employees themselves what effectively amounts to a remainder of shares from the controlling majority.

Now, I am sure there are more things to be done and I am sure some people may take issues with items on this list, my goal here was to extemporaneously jot down a list of things which would retrieve our fate from the clutches of the leviathan which has subsumed our once happy nation. I have the fullest faith and confidence in the character of the inhabitants of this land.

One of the major point I have not addressed herein is Energy. It may be known to some I am curently studying a type of injected bussard configuration for IEC fusion. I am confident that if we reform our educational system and stabilize our economy that we can produce truly revolutionary forms of energy creation within a few decades. many emerging technologies will aid us in this pursuit but forthe time being we cannot be hoaxed into putting ecological sustainability ahead of human interests. We must be cautious as to how we produce our energy and in general we must not promote environmental degredation; however we cannot be so foolish as to imagine that others will hold themselves to our high standards, if we did this would put us at a fatal geostrategic disadvantage. A majority of evnironmental degredation has been empirically shown to be the result of industry, reforming our means of production and that which is produced, eliminating the ability for corporations to externalize costs onto the environment should be our goal. This does not mean co2, I cannot stress enough how nefarious this swindle has become, when I speak of environemtnal degredation I am referring to other substances, but rest assured I do not mean co2.

‘Conspiracy Blogs’ bigger threat than Stalin, Hitler

Let this be a lesson to those who would stage false flag terror attacks in the future in order to goad their populations into supporting wars of aggression for what are ultimately profit motives: you will be held accountable. You will not defeat wisdom, nor shall you silence those who seek the truth. You cannot obscure the evidence and you can only fool all of the people some of the time: you Will be defeated.

The attempt to equate citizens whose solemn duty it is to hold government to account with the despots of yesteryear shall not go unnoticed. The 9-11 truth movement as a whole are the Real patriots who care deeply about this country and its reputation in the world. One commenter’s words are a chilling and pointed indictment of the mind games used by the mainstream media to slander any of those who want to switch off “the movie” and offer humanity a sound historical analysis of events (what used to be called JOURNALISM):

“”Studies of internet sites reveal an unholy alliance between left-wing 9/11 conspiracy theorists, right-wing Holocaust deniers and Islamic fundamentalists.”

I recall a History Channel documentary about OKC that repeated the same meme (from James Woolsey, no less), substituting “9/11 conspiracy theorists” with OKC conspiracy theorists. It’s an amazingly effective meme, because it sutures Holocaust denial with militias and Muslims. In other words, anyone who opposes the government domestically or externally is a Jew-hating conspiracy theorist.” -Simuvac

“Obama already betrayed the US population on FISA, bailout, Iraq, Afghanistan and MUCH more. Yet they STILL think he represents change. The leader of millions of superficial idiots.” -stevedtrm

The case is clear and this citation is but a partial list. Is the claim that a majority of the American electorate is blind to history, they are blind to what happened even last week, not empirically justified by the election of so naked a charlatan? It is more telling the way adulation and praise abound for someone who merely is a good rhetorician and yet is a very bad and dishonest statesman. The way he is being trumped up the world over is very disconcerting to me, the agenda of the CFR thus apparently bears fruits, by controlling the media of the world one can indeed control perception.

But it is the model offered by Dostoevsky that I find encouraging, the man who upon beholding the crystal palace of perfection folds his arms akimbo and says “I don’t like it”. For it is this capacity within our species that encourages me, the capacity for variation which precludes the triumph of falsehood. You can never silence All opposition and even if we today beheld a truly Orwellian system where people are drugged into submission and blinded by so extensive a system of propaganda that the vast majority march in lock-step with whatever brutality a ruling elite desire to force unto the people as an ethos, e would still bear witness to the exceptions to that tyranny: no matter how bad it gets this only Increases the probability for the system to throw exceptions.

The higher the pressure on the system the greater escape velocity for ejected material. And where are these intrepid searchers and researchers going? Where are these strange fish swimming, these birds who fly out, across a vast and seemingly infinite ocean, where is it that they are all heading?

It is they who shall decide the future, for the world truly does revolve inaudibly around the creators of new values.

Atheists Don’t Believe in God

I can neither prove nor refute the existence of deity, as a quantum dualist I must assume that the unified field of energy underlying existence may in fact have a type of consciousness most akin to the taoist concept of “the way” or perhaps o the transcendentalist notion of the “over soul”. Is that deity? I cannot say, to be honest its not really a subject that interests me because i cant prove much about it so why even bother myself with it. thats what gets me about religious people, they all seem to think they can know the mind of god etc, ludicrous. if there were a god or gods how could anyone know what they think and if so why should anyone else belive them! The saddest thing is I am sure some religious person will come along and argue some insane inherency via a Kantian treatment. that is how silly people can be, they have a personal need for there to be a god and will go to any length to create a system which proves his existence.

In a fight against global corporatism and the dominance of an elite people of faith often are my natural allies, whats more I find that on the whole they are also decent people, perhaps even more so than my atheistic friends. But to be perfectly honest its about a horse a piece, neither group has an exclusive claim to be more ethical or humane.

I think it is important to tolerate both because one cannot prove or disprove the point of contention to within a reasonable degree of probability.

When it comes to the theoretical application of a process, or the perspective of that process as accounting for variation etc, again it is important to go with which system is more probably true based on evidence and examination. Available evidence suggests that “evolution” (which is a very complex concept and should not be mistakenly considered to be a codified set of principles in any sense although clearly one could make a list) is the most reasonable explanation for a range of aspects in cell biology. Although we may not understand this process completely, and we may never truly understand it thus not ruling out the hand of some unknown and unknowable god (for instance we might say that our thoughts have some influence on the process or our feelings this would hold with a qm view and yet seem metaphysical enough to insight notions of the divine), we can safely understand the process from the perspective analysis justifies.

The real danger here is interpretation and attitude. As with all science, it is a question of how you use it, it is a tool and one can wield a tool for humane and beneficial purposes or for brutal and inefficient ones.

Evolutionary theory was used to underwrite a gilded age philosophy of might makes right, it has been used again and again by some to underwrite their own arrogance and sense of entitlement to brutalize and dominate others. While we might never wish to dismiss the concept of a theory of rank, we must come to understand that absolute necessity of the whole, we can never make the mistake of thinking we know more than we do! Often one becomes arrogant because they think they understand a complex system well enough to safely make decisions, this is utter folly, one can never understand any system this well and must always make a decision with caution and a circumspection informed by tolerance.

History is full of examples where sweeping decisions were made about systems and the result was that those decisions broke the system because they overlooked or neglected what was vital, sweeping it away out of ignorance as to the integral nature of the system and the role each integer played!

Who knows, perhaps we atheists should learn something here, perhaps as a species we even Need this idea of god now more than ever. If not for ourselves than for others, though it bears incredible risks, it may still serve some vital purpose! Of course my instinct is not friendly to that view, I see religion as a source of manipulation and some of histories greatest atrocities.

Do People Become Atheists so They Can Act Immorally?

There are probably some people who do, but largely no, in fact most atheists start out religious because that’s how they were indoctrinated and gradually come to openly oppose religion after conducting analysis. In my own life I have spent nearly a decade making a comparative study of world religions, from the Elder Eddas to the Eleusinian Mysteries, I love the perspective of religion as astro-theology when it comes to judeo-christianity but the same thing applies to many other systems. Many of the earliest metaphysical systems that we might call pagan religions are closer almost to a quantum view of nature, in that they posit that there are “gods in all things” etc.

The problem here is that without morality one must stand on ethics, which is sufficient, but requires Other People to hold a person to a standard. Deity is more effective because it uses the Threat of repercussions after death (about which we have no experience and therefore it is terrifying) or within this own life via an omnipotent and omnipresent mind. We mustn’t forget however that morality is a perspective informed by a set of values which are human, they are not divine, and they are codified by humans. Thus the two approaches are identical! It is just that with the moralistic one there is an injected fear of divine reprisal to sweeten the pot and keep people from doing ill to one another or acting unjustly. But isn’t this also the source of a greater volatility within the morality system? All too often we have evidence of god being used as the justification for bloodshed!

I prefer ethics, without a concept of the divine, governed by a culture (which, as plato reminds us, is a difficult thing to produce and should be our primary concern) a culture which rigorously pursues the concept of justice.

Predictive Programming

for a long time this was dismissed and chided as conspiracy theory. and now you have people asking “what with this economic crisis (which imo is completely engineered, its not as if all the pigs died or we suddenly forgot how to make steel) maybe its a good idea for us to have some kind of north american currency! after all, we need a solution to this problem the people seem to be reacting to!”

and i know why the majority of the electorate is blind to it all, and so do you, dont you my friends? you know, only all too well perhaps, just how and why they remain ignorant, even willfully ignorant of the entire phenomenology of global corporatism which has supplanted all cultures and governments. they are complicit and those who are not complicit have been harassed from the day of their birth by junk information and a poisoned world, the MSG, aspartame, heavy metals and fluoride; the endless propaganda and the puppy mill educational system that wants obedient workers and not free spirits.

and you know also that it is up to you, to reject all of this negativity and unhealthy madness and to forge from the crucible of your own heart a future for the species. it is up to You. And where many might throw up their hands at the calamity and insurmountable tasks that thwart our satisfaction, I take solace in you.

I am credulous about the destiny of the human species and I believe more than i can ever prove about the fate of mankind.

You can find many case histories which mirror those of the german people circa 1930.

For it is not the authenticity of the claims made by the article, nor the validity of its assertions which should pique your curiosity, no, it is the lingering probability and available references from the near historical record of programs like rex 84. We imprisoned Japanese citizens in internment camps during WW2, did that magically not happen? We run a private, for profit prison industrial complex in this country so vast that it dwarfs the prison populations of other western countries, is that not happening?

One commenter even said “break out the tin foil hats”, is that what has become of reasoned debate in this country? A sort of high school popularity contest but for ideas? Detractors often do no critical analysis and yet are quite confident that there is nothing to be worried about. And I am not speaking of just people who thumbed this shit down on SU, my analysis here I am applying in the widest possible context to the entirety of the american electorate.

I see in the countenances of those who throw around epithets at issues like this a sort of self-deception and complete rejection of history. These are not just bad students of human history, they truly are the bedrock of tyranny, for tyranny cannot ever come to fruition amongst a vigilant populace.

What, in the last analysis makes us human? I have heard some people call it choice, but I must admit I have no belief in a so-called free will which chooses. To me control is an illusion and identity is a maze of infinite complexity.

i think the best architect is also the one who realizes control is an illusion and that the variable you didn’t account for is the one thing you can count on. live dangerously my friend.

Stop Rearranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic and Nationalize the Damn Banks

We haven’t nationalized the banks, what we have done is to allow a private group of bankers to recapitalize failed (deliberately engineered to fail) institutions built on flawed (deliberately flawed) instruments via the treasury.

So in other words, its the same scam taken to a new level. Instead of the fed merely usurping congress’ power to create money, issuing the government its money at interest in a never ending cycle of debt expansion, they have succeeded in performing an end run (by scaring the shit out of weak kneed congressional reps) on the entire system of governmental finance.

Would that we had nationalized the fed or these banks, would that the congress reasserted its power over money, but no. No, we instead have entered an era of inevitable hyperinflationary practice at the end of which our nation shall be a threadbare mockery of what so many have died to defend.

So years of study has led me to one final conclusion about economic theory: it is all fucking make believe.

There is only production, the rest is a contrivance as fickle and as feeble as the dreams of youth. Yep, its all completely made up, the value of everything is completely subjective. The only thing that matters is production, the res tis capital it is either property or it is “that which has been produced and retains a subjective value”.

But whence come all those values?

From here on out every human being to me is sacred. It is my sworn duty to kill and to destroy every society which does not have a vested interest in every human being born. Any society that would throw away even one human being is an atavism and laughing stock to me.

Any economic theory which does not result in maximizing the potential of the human beings alive during a given interval is a contrivance more absurd than is organized religion and it seems very much like a religion to me.

It is as if, people had never Practiced science and only read about it being practiced.

Any practicing researcher knows one thing above all else about statistics and proofs: they are perspectives. Indeed the term proof is somewhat misleading, because what proof means is something other than what people think it means. Inconceivable! A proof is a step upon which to place one’s foot, empirical data is limited, every proof is merely a description of what is valid within a context and that context is always limited. What people forget is that it is contextual, that it doesn’t prove anything other than that which it states within a given context and that it is ultimately (and this is absolutely key) true until proved otherwise!

eal scientists approach statistical data critically and almost skeptically. Real scientists understand that the complexity of existence always maligns the very process of data generation! This is why it is imperative to design experiments with such meticulous precision, so as to rule out junk data skewing the results!

But look at how the masses clamor for all manner of data, poor, bedraggled and huddled together statistics, as if somehow the mere act of assembling information constituted a proof!